In partnership with

Happy Wednesday, social pros!

I hate to bring up the whole TikTok ban situation again, but it feels like deja vu from earlier this year.

TikTok's countdown has hit single digits with just nine days (at the time of this writing) until potential digital exile. President Trump's post-inauguration deadline extension to April 4th (via a legally dubious executive order) has Oracle scrambling to meet impossible demands: foreign entities can own no more than 20% and must surrender algorithm control. Meanwhile, TikTok's executive suite shows cracks with VP Blake Chandlee departing, even as the company deploys heartstring-tugging campaigns to sway an American public that ironically doesn't want the ban.

But with the law already passed, it's purely a race against time—and despite Trump's claims that no further extensions will be needed, the hourglass is running dangerously low.

So I’m sure by the time next week’s newsletter hits your inbox, I’ll have another, bigger update to share with you. But until then, let’s jump into the latest happening in the social media world this week!

But before I get to that, this week’s Social Media Journal is brought to you by a software I use at Harden Digital and Design, Hubspot:

Use AI as Your Personal Assistant

Ready to save precious time and let AI do the heavy lifting?

Save time and simplify your unique workflow with HubSpot’s highly anticipated AI Playbook—your guide to smarter processes and effortless productivity.

Threads Platform Updates: New Features & Strategic Implications

Key Updates Summary

Meta's Twitter/X alternative, Threads, has announced several significant platform updates aimed at improving user engagement and content discovery:

  1. Profile Topic Tags: Users can now add topics of interest to their profiles, displayed below their bio. These tags serve dual purposes - helping others discover like-minded accounts and allowing visitors to explore conversations about those topics.

  2. Enhanced Topic Tagging: The post composer now suggests trending topics or topics related to previous posts. According to internal data, posts with topic tags generally receive more views than those without.

  3. Refined Reply Controls: Users can now limit replies and quote-posts to followers only, adding an important safety element.

  4. Reintroduction of Political Content: Threads is phasing political content back into the platform "in a more personalized way," potentially making the app more relevant during major news events.

  5. Customizable Feed Display: Users can personalize the order of their feeds, including making custom topic feeds their default view when opening the app.

  6. Updated Video Player: New pause, play, skip buttons, and a pinned progress bar make video content easier to navigate.

Are People Actually Using Threads?

This update package raises important questions about Threads' current adoption and success:

  • The emphasis on profile topic tags suggests Meta is addressing a key problem: users aren't following enough accounts. In an age where recommendation algorithms can serve content without follows, Meta recognizes creators need to build audiences to feel invested in the platform.

  • The reintroduction of political content indicates Threads may have felt "out of touch" during major news events - addressing a criticism that it lacks real-time relevance compared to X/Twitter.

  • The addition of custom default feeds points to Meta trying to create stronger community bonds within specific interest areas - something X/Twitter has historically excelled at.

These changes suggest Threads has struggled to fully capture the real-time, topic-driven conversations that made Twitter valuable, particularly for sports communities and news-focused users.

Strategic Opportunities for Success on Threads

These updates open several strategic opportunities for content creators and brands:

  1. Topic Optimization: Strategically tagging content and profile with relevant topics could significantly increase visibility, as Meta confirms tagged posts receive more views.

  2. Community Building: The follower-only engagement controls could help create more exclusive, focused communities around specific topics or creators.

  3. Vertical-Specific Feeds: Creating and setting custom feeds as default could help establish deeper expertise in specific verticals.

  4. Political/News Engagement: As political content returns to the platform, there may be opportunities for thoughtful commentary on current events that was previously deprioritized.

  5. Video Content Strategy: The improved video player suggests Meta may be prioritizing video engagement, potentially offering better reach for video creators.

Looking Forward

These updates collectively point to Threads' ambition to better facilitate "real-time, topical engagement" - directly addressing what the article calls "the biggest knock on the app." The question remains whether these changes will be enough to convert established communities from X/Twitter, particularly sports-focused groups described as "the biggest holdout."

For marketers and content creators, these changes warrant experimentation with the platform's new features, especially for those who have previously found Threads lacking in discoverability or engagement compared to other platforms.

The success of these updates may ultimately determine whether Threads becomes a true alternative to X or remains a secondary platform in the social media ecosystem.

This Week’s Social Media Meme

Social media managers when a new platform comes out…

The Price of Digital Peace: Would You Pay to Escape the Ad Machine?

Let's face it: scrolling through social media these days feels like navigating an obstacle course of sponsored content, targeted ads, and algorithmic suggestions that somehow know you've been thinking about buying new running shoes. Meta's latest move in the UK—potentially offering an ad-free subscription following a settlement with privacy advocate Tanya O'Carroll—raises an age-old internet question that refuses to die: would we actually pay for peace and quiet in our digital lives?

The case itself is fascinating. O'Carroll didn't win the sweeping victory she hoped for, but her settlement creates an interesting ripple effect. Meta might now extend its European subscription model to UK users, essentially saying, "Don't want us using your data for ads? Sure thing—just open your wallet."

There's something deeply ironic about paying to exercise what many consider a fundamental right to privacy. It's like being charged an exit fee from a party you never asked to attend in the first place. The core argument—that users shouldn't have to pay to enact their legal rights—feels intuitively correct to most of us. Yet here we are, contemplating digital toll booths on the information superhighway.

Twitter (now X) tried this route with its premium offerings, and other platforms have experimented with similar models. But has it worked? The evidence suggests mixed results at best. Most users seem to accept the devil-they-know of targeted advertising rather than shell out monthly fees for an ad-free experience.

I've often wondered about this psychological calculus we perform. We'll happily drop $5 on a coffee without blinking but balk at paying the same amount to reclaim our attention from advertisers. Perhaps it's because the "free" model has been baked into our expectations for so long that paying feels like getting fleeced for something that should be complimentary—like being charged for napkins at a restaurant.

For the platforms themselves, subscription models present a precarious balance. Meta's experience in Europe—where regulators forced them to slash prices—demonstrates the tightrope walk between profitable alternatives and regulatory compliance. The "data capitalism" that powers these platforms doesn't transition easily to a subscription economy.

And what about us, the users? Do we really want to fracture our online experience into tiers of haves and have-nots? A world where privacy becomes a premium feature rather than a standard setting feels dystopian in ways that even Black Mirror might consider a bit on-the-nose.

Perhaps the most telling insight comes from Meta's own expectation that most people will stick with the ad-supported version. They know us too well (ironically, because of all the data they've collected). Our collective inertia and fondness for "free" services means most of us will keep scrolling past ads, grumbling but not quite angry enough to pull out our credit cards.

As more legal challenges inevitably emerge, we're witnessing the slow, messy evolution of what the digital social contract should look like. The question isn't just whether we'd pay for an ad-free experience—it's whether we should have to.

What do you think? Would you pay a monthly fee to scroll in peace, or are we better off demanding stronger privacy laws that don't come with a price tag attached? The answer might say more about our digital future than any regulatory decision ever could.

Looking For More?

Get a FREE Social Media Audit!

Wondering how you’re doing on the social media front? We’ve got you covered! We’re offering you a FREE social media audit of all your profiles!

We’ll take a deep dive into your accounts, looking at your profile setup and how your posts are doing. We’ll then provide you expert feedback and recommendations to help take your accounts to the next level.

Interested? Get in touch today!

Our Favorite Software

This newsletter is distributed through beehiiv, the BEST platform for newsletters and email marketing. If you write a newsletter, you’ll want to try it!

We use Vista Social for managing all of our clients’ social media accounts. We love it! It has everything you need and you can’t beat the price!

Newsletter Brought to You By Harden Digital and Design

Reply

or to participate

Keep Reading

No posts found